Asynchronous Logging
Asynchronous logging enables the minimum overhead of Pino. Asynchronous logging works by buffering log messages and writing them in larger chunks.
const pino = require('pino')
const logger = pino(pino.destination({
dest: './my-file', // omit for stdout
minLength: 4096, // Buffer before writing
sync: false // Asynchronous logging
}))It’s always possible to turn on synchronous logging by passing sync: true.
In this mode of operation, log messages are directly written to the
output stream as the messages are generated with a blocking operation.
- See
pino.destination pino.destinationis implemented onsonic-boom⇗.
AWS Lambda
Asynchronous logging in AWS Lambda functions will tend to cause delayed or lost log messages, as logs may not be written to the destination before the runtime is frozen.
For Lambda deployments, it’s recommended to always use a destination
with sync: true.
Caveats
Asynchronous logging has a couple of important caveats:
- As opposed to the synchronous mode, there is not a one-to-one relationship between
calls to logging methods (e.g.
logger.info) and writes to a log file - There is a possibility of the most recently buffered log messages being lost in case of a system failure, e.g. a power cut.
Flush Limitations with pino-pretty
logger.flush() does not flush the output of pino-pretty because:
-
Transport Architecture:
pino-prettyruns in a separate worker thread via the transport mechanism. -
Cross-Thread Flush:
logger.flush(cb)does reach the worker. Since thread-stream#198 the worker waits for the shared buffer to be drained, then looks for a flush primitive on the destination the transport returned:flush,flushSync, or a pendingdrain. -
No Flush Primitive: The stream
pino-prettyreturns exposes none of those. Its bufferedSonicBoomis reachable only through the internalpump, so the worker has nothing to call and acknowledges the flush right away.
This means that even with logger.flush(), your formatted logs may not appear immediately. The flush only guarantees that the main thread buffer was written and that the worker drained the shared buffer, not that pino-pretty has written its formatted output.
See also: